浏览本商品所属分类:首页 > 经济 > 经济法
《经济与法》
经济与法
作者:张燕生
译者:
开本:
ISBN:780080372
出版社:群言出版社
出版日期:2004-05-01
装帧:
书夫曼编号:666790
原价: 36.8
普通会员:34.41  一星会员:33.38
二星会员:32.69  三星会员:32.00

内容简介
  一部民事纠纷常见案例的荟萃,一部解决民事纠纷的经典读本,一次填补国内司法空白的尝试。
中央电视台二频道《经济与法》,是深受广大观众欢迎的品牌栏目。精彩生动的案例,准确剖析经济与法的密切关系。作者深感于此,认为每一个公民都必须维护经济法,才级做合格的经济人。热切希望本书成为大家的案头书。




顾客评论
>>浏览该商品的全部评论 >>我要发表评论

目录

目        录          借款纠纷剪不断                                      逼人写欠条    法院判无效                                              [法眼点评]显示公平的民事行为无效                                      未打借条毁了二十年友情                                              [法眼点评]没有证据有苦难言                                      借据未收回再还五万三                                      按捐购车清欠缺少“杀手锏”                                              [法眼点评]银行“手太软”架不住欠款人“心太硬”                                      贷款人购车后去向不明        ‘                                              [法眼点评]要坐“宝马”就要还贷                                      借款二千万    夫妻玩失踪                                              [法眼点评]“为人”和“口碑”替代不了诚信                                              财产诉讼理还乱                                      二十二年后老“屋”归原主                                              [法眼点评]保护公民合法财产是法律的义务                                      半世纪老宅    十二载诉讼                                              [法眼点评]一场马拉松官司的胜诉说明了什么                                      产权转让起纠纷    给付欠款理当然                                              [法眼点评]股份转让不公平最终结出苦果                                      豆腐坊老板状告城建监察大队                                              [法眼点评]违章建筑也不能无条件拆除                                      精神病人为了卖房匆匆结婚                                              [法眼点评]精神病人结婚.  卖房是无效民事行为                                      父亲卷走房款    撇下毁容女儿                                              [法眼点评]父亲与女友同样无情                                      黄金铺面纠纷引发十年诉讼                                              [法眼点评]“马拉松”官司误了赵氏兄弟前程                                      为姑姑修房垫费    姑姑却将房产送人                                              [法眼点评]公平原则使赵先生挽回部分损失                                      录音带帮助老人索回女儿留下的黄金首饰                                              [法眼点评]吞食“友情”的女人坏透顶                                      说不清理还乱的“黄金失窃”诉讼                                              [法眼点评]法院应该立案受理                                      同居不是你想象    相处不难分手难                                              [法眼点评]非法同居谨防“后遗症”                                      婚前财产约定第一案女方败诉                                              [法眼点评]处置婚前财产须慎重                                          巨颧大奖搅起多角纠纷                                              [法眼点评]莫让“天上掉下的馅饼”砸昏                                          家人纷争不休    遗嘱被判无效                                              [法眼点评]巨额保险金该由谁保管                                          “甜蜜事业”遭遇糊涂拍卖                                              [法眼点评]公正执法    善莫大焉                                      谁制造了假按揭“黑洞”                                              [法眼点评]“一女多嫁”严重损害业主利益                                      让人匪夷所思的土地纠纷案                                              [法眼点评]案件审理程序违法不该发生                                      越权审批出让土地    两百农民告赢政府                                              [法眼点评]农民的权利不容侵犯                                              上当受骗心不甘                                          “承诺办学”:一场误人子弟的闹剧                                              [法眼点评]五千元买不来被耽误的青春                                          “签约家教”将承诺当玩笑                                              [法眼点评]家教行业的职业道德亟待提高                                          欺诈招生引发东方学城退学风波                                              [法眼点评]大学为何也搞欺诈                                      让人揪心的“纠偏学校”                                                      [法眼点评]对孩子负责就是对未来负责                                      一个高智商学生的“超常”遭遇                                          [法眼点评]民办学校不可逾越“禁区”                                      —句谎盲“折价”三万元                                              [法眼点评]孩子不应该受到伤害                                      合法租房竟成“空中楼阁”                                              [法眼点评]房屋出租违约者得到应有处罚                                      利用“世界之最”广告牌进行欺诈                                          [法眼点评]诈骗引发连环经济纠纷                                      拍卖中心出一怪    旧车背着一身债                                              [法眼点评]拍卖标的物存在瑕疵应告知竞买人                                      投注站主贪小便宜私自注销中奖号码                                              [法眼点评]贪小便宜吃大亏                                      中奖五百万    原是空欢喜                                              [法眼点评]欠缺客观事实不可能胜诉                                              企业行为应规范                                      得莫利炖活鱼“炖出”商标保护案                                              [法眼点评]商标与地名是不同的                                      “红帽”私企被迫破产引发赔偿                                              [法眼点评]让县政府赔偿损失是合理合法的                                      “一女二嫁”引发巨额诉讼                                              [法眼点评]必须依法投资                                      超市突然关门    供应商索债无路                                              [法眼点评]超市“黑洞”产生的元凶                                      名瓷仿冒品挤垮正宗货                                              [法眼点评]商标侵权真是不治之症吗                                      开发商偷换“物管”受到质疑                                              [法眼点评]变更物管公司理应征求业主意见                                      迷途“红狮”后悔莫及                                              [法眼点评]警惕兼并“掮客”                                      手机用户与运营商对簿公堂                                              [法眼点评]不能保证正常通话应负何责                                          信口开河商家自食其果                                              [法眼点评]言必行才能维护商家诚信                                      野蛮拆迁遭遇“红灯”                                              [法眼点评]“阳光拆迁”势在必行                                      银行为失信付出代价                                              [法眼点评]银行应该对失信负责                                      上市时难退亦难                                              [法眼点评]国资转让法律要做“先行官”                                      一公司开“空头支票”吃官司                                              [法眼点评]留学生受骗之后拿起法律武器                                      十八户渔民告赢九家排污企业                                              [法眼点评]还渔民一片碧水蓝天                                      中小企业频频“腾笼换鸟”为哪般                                              [法眼点评]“鸟儿”另择新技“笼子”将成摆设                                      浴池玻璃坠落    切断顾客腿筋                                              [法眼点评]浴池经营者赔偿损失                                      私设浴池摔伤顾客被判赔偿                                              [法眼点评]经营场所应采取安全防护措施                                      一位先生在超市购物受伤之后                                              [法眼点评]经营者理应赔偿消费者的损失                                              公民维权受保护                                      打工触电致残谁来买单                                              [法眼点评]应由雇主承担主要责任                                      企业欠工资不支付    法院强制执行难                                              [法眼点评]民工的利益谁来保护                                      民工为何陷入讨债难的“维权怪圈”                                              [法眼点评]法律应保护弱势群体                                      外地施工人员旷日持久的维权行动获胜                                              [法眼点评]维护合法权益要从“头”做起                                      丈夫受工伤昏迷不醒    妻子盼赔偿尽快执行                                              [法眼点评]赔偿可以减轻受害者情感上的痛苦                                      丢失婚礼录像带    法院判赔五千元                                              [法眼点评]婚庆服务中心冤枉吗                                      道士上法庭维护肖像权                                              [法眼点评]社会进步的生动例证                                          贵州医疗事故鉴定半数“翻案”                                              [法眼点评]患者不应该是弱者                                          开颅手术遭遇停电事故                                              [法眼点评]医院将人的生命当儿戏                                              女婴胎死腹中获赔两万                                              [法眼点评]医疗机构有过错也应赔偿损失                                      医院“改动病历”引发患者知情权之争                                              [法眼点评]让患者获得充分的知情权                                      出版权受侵犯    获赔人民币二十万                                              [法眼点评]“词典”获得赔偿令人欣喜                                      输血感染丙肝获赔巨款                                              [法眼点评]举证不能也承担责任                                              千奇百怪世人惊                                              “官选”与“民选”哪家说了算                                              [法眼点评]让“民选”业委会当家作主                                              “黑脸包公”缘何成被告                                              [法眼点评]股权变更引发行政诉讼                                      被帮助者向帮忙者索赔三万元                                              [法眼点评]要提倡依法助人                                      一农民状告派出所败诉                                              [法眼点评]民警也是普通公民                                      假币究竟出自谁手                                              [法眼点评]银行如何证明假币非出已乎                                              投保人保险人各有说法                                              [法眼点评]保险人不能随意解除保险合同                                              京西举人节引发“状元风波”                                              [法眼点评]愿京西单人节越办越好                                              老师逼着写检查    学生患了精神病                                              [法眼点评]教书育人应以情取胜                                      谁该为学生伤害事故负责                                              [法眼点评]以人为本    教书育人                                      酒楼女部长敬酒敬死大学教师                                              [法眼点评]服务也会造成意外后果                                      妻子拿走家里的钱被以涉嫌盗窃拘留                                              [法眼点评]支配夫妻共同财产不构成涉嫌盗窃                                      女民警身亡“120”缘何成被告                                                [法眼点评]城市“120”急救中心不宜设在一家医院                                      “疯妻”娶进门    喜事变悲剧                                              [法眼点评]婚姻虽解除    噩梦却难醒                                      亡者家属对殡葬暴利说不                                              [法眼点评]殡葬业何以成为暴利行业                                          网络新闻纠纷    遭遇法律盲区                                              [法眼点评]互联网亟待规范                                      乡民怒告村官                                              [法眼点评]举证倒置彰显司法公正                                      两极动物检疫执法人员当街斗殴                                              [法眼点评]面对利益失去理性                                      医生剪掉两岁男孩的手指                                              [法眼点评]孩子的遭遇给医院敲响警钟                                      公安局状告不当得利人                                              [法眼点评]这笔钱应该返还公安局                                      主动助人造成损失谁买单                                                  [法眼点评]帮助别人管理事务应把握合理限度                                      牵线搭桥为揩油    违法犯罪竟不知                                              [法眼点评]介绍贿赂也是罪                                      救人者强索感谢费                                              [法眼点评]救人与经济效益挂钩对吗                                      生母伙同他人打死亲儿子                                              [法眼点评]把被打死的孩子唤醒


经济与法-相关图书
·管理者的自我管理
·高级财务会计学
·法国民法典
·瞬态动力学CAE解决方案MSC·Dytran基础教程
·涉外保险
·行动:在素质教育中
·日本民法典
·在省部级主要领导干部提高构建社会主义和谐社会能力专题研讨班上
·商业银行会计学
·翻译与概念整合
·审计实务
·英语阅读菁华:科普篇
·汉英中国哲学辞典
·企业会计
·十大机心彩色电视机维修精要与实例·第3册
·中国律师年鉴:2001-2003
·皮肤性病科书病中医临床诊治.第2版
·武器装备采办合同管理导论
·西行印象:一位经济学教授的心灵之旅
·中国近代史论著目录:1979-2000
未分类图书 网站地图 全部分类